<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robert Newkirk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newkirkknows.com</link>
	<description>Motivational Speaker and Author</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 21:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Healing In America</title>
		<link>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/05/healing-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/05/healing-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 21:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>newkirkr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newkirkknows.com/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[   If there has ever been a time for healing in America, now is the time.  If you take a snapshot of all the controversial issues that dwell in the news today, America is on the pathway to a relationship implosion, whether through the family, communal, societal, or national. Whether it bounds around the issue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-150" title="WorkingRobert2" src="http://www.newkirkknows.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/WorkingRobert2.jpg" alt="WorkingRobert2" width="482" height="511" />   If there has ever been a time for healing in America, now is the time.  If you take a snapshot of all the controversial issues that dwell in the news today, America is on the pathway to a relationship implosion, whether through the family, communal, societal, or national. Whether it bounds around the issue of race, gender, marital status, class, or professional status, we all must start towards healing from our historical separatist society.  Let’s take note of the recent issues at hand: The comments made by Harry Reid and Rob Blajovich concerning President Obama, the Tiger Woods situation, the country’s split reaction to the Health Care Reform Bill, and most recently, the Jesse James situation. As a result, there seem to be an extraordinary amount of apologies that are coming before the media all due to the fact that people are unsure of how to express themselves without having the negative connotations associated with today’s media attention from allegedly offending other people. These incidences along with the media’s reaction to them clearly show that we must come to a better understanding of each other so that we can create healthy relationships and begin to move this country forward from its potentially  disempowering, paralyzing history.</p>
<p>In order for healing to start to take place, people that are involved must first face the reality of the situation and own up to their part of what caused the situation in the first place.  So if we are talking about health care, we must look at the cause of why there are people in this country without health care and what has caused it over the years.  This issue alone is a clear demonstration that the nation as a whole is hurting and needs to be healed.  If we are talking about the overdose of recent extramarital affairs, in order for those relationships to heal, each party involved must be able to own up to their contribution to the breakdown of the relationship.  The news media will angle the story as one being the monster or the guilty perpetrator and the other as the innocent victim.  But in truth, both parties are responsible for the breakdown in the relationship.  However, the responsibility is not necessarily equal.  In some cases, the responsibility may be 50-50.  In other cases, it may be 95-5.  This is in many cases equivalent to what the media considers the innocent victim situation.  Let’s specifically look at the situation with Jesse James and Sandra Bullock.</p>
<p>Here is Jesse James, the owner of West Coast Choppers who is married to Sandra Bullock, famous actress who recently won the Oscar for Best Actress from the movie, The Blind Side. Sandra Bullock, who is considered, “the girl next door star” has found her acting career at an all time high with a seemingly blemish-free image that America seems to love dearly.  But outside of being a former Texas cheerleader in high school, very little is known about her, which is a tribute to her for keeping her personal life out of the limelight.  Then there is Jesse James who fame has come from building motorcycles and his most recent appearance on the Apprentice. He is a quiet, laid back guy who somehow due to his dress and appearance has taken on a “bad boy” image.  Now there are allegations that Jesse James has had extramarital affairs with as many as four other women.  US Weekly has plastered him with the headline, “Married to a Monster.”  People magazine has victimized Sandra Bullock with the headline, “Inside Sandra’s Heartbreak.”  The Hollywood entertainment community promotes it as the highlight of her career overshadowed by her husband’s scandal and her personal life now laid out in magazines.  Needless to say, the ladies involved in contributing to this affair are immediately demoralized by the media and setup for 15 minutes of fame only to be tossed out once the damage has been completed.  This is made obvious when the first question from the media is “Will she divorce him?” But is this situation all on Jesse James?  Is it possible that Sandra Bullock could have something to do with what Jesse James did?  Did she neglect him or verbally abuse him in some way? My point earlier was that if it comes to a broken relationship, it is a result of the contributions of both parties.  Now by no means am I suggesting that this situation is a 50-50 contribution.  Also by no means am I trying to justify what Jesse allegedly did. This has the signs of a 95-5 contribution (95% Jesse James, 5% Sandra Bullock).  We as a society can only speculate, but we don’t know.  The point I am trying to make is to pray that they will be able to heal, because the situation is a travesty for both of them.  But in order for them to heal, each person has to confess to their contribution to the broken relationship.  Whatever Jesse James did to create the mess they are in, he has to confess and repent to Sandra, himself, and to the Lord God the Creator for his wrongdoing (all 95% of it if that is truly the case).  Then Sandra must confess the little (5%) of what she may have done, whether intentionally or subconsciously, to create the broken relationship.  One thing is for certain, this situation did not just occur overnight or just after the Oscars.  This relationship has been manifesting into its broken state for a while.  I hope and pray that the media will relax their stance to allow them to fix it and heal as opposed to driving them straight towards divorce which does not benefit anyone. The same applies for Tiger Woods situation and any other marital relationship that is struggling through some sort of brokenness.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.robertfnewkirk.com">www.robertfnewkirk.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/05/healing-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speaking at the Boy&#8217;s Leadership Conference</title>
		<link>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/speaking-at-boys-leadership-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/speaking-at-boys-leadership-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newkirkknows.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Friday, I had a wonderful opportunity speaking to a Boy&#8217;s Leadership Group at Westfield High School located in Chantilly, VA for their Thanksgiving Luncheon. These were students that when they first came to the high school were not meeting the academic standards and were having behavioral issues. My topic was, &#8220;The Essence of Work [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Friday, I had a wonderful opportunity speaking to a Boy&#8217;s Leadership Group at Westfield High School located in Chantilly, VA for their Thanksgiving Luncheon. These were students that when they first came to the high school were not meeting the academic standards and were having behavioral issues. My topic was, &#8220;The Essence of Work Ethics &#038; The Ten P&#8217;s of Passion.&#8221; And I got my turkey eats on early!  Thanks to all of the people who provided a video testimony message revolving around the need for math and science.  Your testimonies were invaluable!  Having a slew of aviation and science professionals that could have been sitting in the room with the students giving educational tips throughout the briefing had instant impact on the students that were participating.  I even received hugs from the guys after the briefing was over.  The briefing was well received.  The administrators for this program have done a tremendous job in turning these gentlemen&#8217;s lives around.  I was extremely impressed with the atmosphere and the camraderie that has manifested now that they are a part of it.  I was happy to contribute my talents to it.</p>
<p>More critical thoughts will be forthcoming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/speaking-at-boys-leadership-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critical Thought #5:  The Power of Love</title>
		<link>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-power-of-love/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-power-of-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Thinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newkirkknows.com/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Humility is simply believing and accepting what God says about us, and God says that we are anything but worthless.- Myles Munroe 
God is love.  Love is the divine connection that links all of us together. Love is an attitude of the heart, not just an emotion.  The English language extremely limits the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>Humility is simply believing and accepting what God says about us, and God says that we are anything but worthless.- Myles Munroe </strong></p></blockquote>
<p>God is love.  Love is the divine connection that links all of us together. Love is an attitude of the heart, not just an emotion.  The English language extremely limits the vast power that love has to offer.  Therefore, in our understanding of it, we use it to describe our feelings and attitude towards a wide range of objects.  However, love actually falls into four major different types of love in Egyptian Hieroglythics as well as the Hebrew and Greek languages.   These types of love are phileo, storge, eros, and agape.  Each type identifies a separate and distinct type of love.  </p>
<p>       Phileo represents the love of friendship, the most generic of all the love types. We being social creatures by nature are very familiar with this type of love.  Most relationships whether professional, social, emotional, or marital, start with this type of love.  It creates friendships in our outer circle down to friendships in our inner circle.</p>
<p>       Storge represents the love of family.  This includes the affection developed between parents and their children and vice versa.  It also represents the close feelings that exist between siblings and one&#8217;s extended family such as grandparents, cousins, aunts, uncles, etc.  However, this love is not necessarily guaranteed, yet we often take it for granted because everyone is family.  Yet there is extreme power built in this type of love that brings everyone together or it can be very destructive if this love is betrayed. So beware of exercising storge due to obligation as opposed to desire.</p>
<p>         Eros is the most popular of the love types as it represents sexual love.  However, this can be misleading because sex has nothing to do with love and they are not codependent on each other.  Eros then becomes a warm, intimate expression of love, but not love itself.  Sensuality or lust is the center of focus and a person who only focus on this type of love has no regard for the feelings or desires of the other person.  They are only interested in personal gratification and cares less of human dignity.</p>
<p>         Agape is the deepest of the love types as it represents divine or unconditional love.  This is the highest type of love that we as human beings can strive for.  This is the love God has for THEE&#8217;s people as well as the love THEE&#8217;s people give back to THEE.  We are also supposed to have this type of love for one another unconditionally.  When we accomplish this type of love, then and only then does God become one with us.  Agape is oneness in heart and spirit.  The power here is that it is a choice (tomorrow&#8217;s power topic). Love is not a feeling, but a decision.  Agape is constant, yet we often want to change our terms with it due to certain conditions.  Yet, what we fail to realize is that those conditions can often be mitigated by maintaining agape love.</p>
<p>There is massive power in love as each type allows us to synergize our powers with other people to maximize the potential to create something awesome and grand. Replace the love of power with the power of love!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-power-of-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critical Thought #20: The Essence of Power</title>
		<link>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-essence-of-power/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-essence-of-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THEE Diamond of Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newkirkknows.com/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the Power of Love conquers the Love of Power, the world will then find peace.  &#8211; Jimi Hendrix
This week&#8217;s critical thinking will focus on the essence of power.  Power according to Webster&#8217;s Dictionary is defined as &#8220;the ability to control or influence someone or something.&#8221;  This definition is very misleading and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>When the Power of Love conquers the Love of Power, the world will then find peace.  &#8211; Jimi Hendrix</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>This week&#8217;s critical thinking will focus on the essence of power.  Power according to Webster&#8217;s Dictionary is defined as &#8220;the ability to control or influence someone or something.&#8221;  This definition is very misleading and I consider it one of the major causes of the ills the world is having today.  So according to Webster, if I want to be powerful, then I can only prove it by having control or influence over someone else.  That is what I consider to be &#8220;offensive power.&#8221;  The only problem is this type of power is limited as what goes around comes around.  Sooner or later, somebody else will assume that same power over me.  So allow me to redefine that definition for you.  I define power as &#8220;the ability to put yourself in a state so that no one can have control or influence over you.&#8221;  This eliminate the proof of being powerful, you just are.  This is a form of divine power, which is eternal.  If people were to embrace this definition into their psyche,  the need to have control can easily be replaced by the need to connect. Connecting with other people will bring into alignment an ultimate power that includes everyone in taking part.  This opens up for the different types of power to occur which will all be covered this week:  The Power of Love, The Power of Choice, The Power of Presence, The Power of Questioning, and The Power of Faith w/ Action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-essence-of-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critical Thought #1: Power of Testimonies</title>
		<link>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Thinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newkirkknows.com/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to have a testimony, you must first be put through a test!
For the longest time, I always wondered why people reacted so emotionally when they stood before an audience and gave a personal testimony. I could empathize with them in what they had gone through, but I couldn&#8217;t quite relate directly with it. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>In order to have a testimony, you must first be put through a test!</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>For the longest time, I always wondered why people reacted so emotionally when they stood before an audience and gave a personal testimony. I could empathize with them in what they had gone through, but I couldn&#8217;t quite relate directly with it. It wasn&#8217;t until I found myself in the middle of something that wasn&#8217;t just for a day, but a two year plus period that I finally got it. That is why the derivative in the word testimony is the word test. In order to appreciate something out of life, you have to sacrifice a little bit of yourself in the midst of it. Put me through the test!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critical Thought #13: Relationship Between Control &amp; Growth</title>
		<link>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Thinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newkirkknows.com/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an inverse relationship between control and growth. The more you have control over something, the less it will be able to grow.
If two people are in constant struggle to gain control over their relationships, whether they are professional, social, marital, or intimate, the relationship itself will become stymied. As the evolution of life [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>There is an inverse relationship between control and growth. The more you have control over something, the less it will be able to grow.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>If two people are in constant struggle to gain control over their relationships, whether they are professional, social, marital, or intimate, the relationship itself will become stymied. As the evolution of life continues, the people will continue to grow and sooner or later, they will eventually grow out of the relationship. Unfortunately, when this happens, the relationship can even get to the point that it dissolves violently. So if we desire our relationships to grow and be a benefit to us, we must learn to relinquish control over the relationship. What things can we do to ensure that we are letting go of the control wheel with the relationship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critical Thought #2: Vote 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Thinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newkirkknows.com/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vote 2009
Hurray, we voted in Barack Obama as the 44th president of the United States! Also, the House of Representatives and the Senate are situated such that the majority of the congressmen are in direct support of the President. That process all took place in November 2008. Our job is complete. We are happy and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vote 2009</strong><br />
Hurray, we voted in Barack Obama as the 44th president of the United States! Also, the House of Representatives and the Senate are situated such that the majority of the congressmen are in direct support of the President. That process all took place in November 2008. Our job is complete. We are happy and content. So what is this about the vote in 2009? It cannot possibly be important because 2008 is set for the next two years and four years for the President. There was no need to vote. Wrong! The Vote of 2009 was very important because it was for key positions that are closer to home. The Governors for Virginia and New Jersey were up for election as well as the State Attorney Generals and the Vice Governors. For the President to become fully effective, those positions also needed to be in alignment with him. But this year, the turn out was very low and especially in the state of Virginia, the vote went back to the old traditional ways of the state. The Republicans swept every position up for election. In the USA Today, it quoted that the GOP chief calls win a ‘blow’ to Obama. Why, because many of you neglected to get out and vote in accordance to how you did in 2008. Your vote was very important, but you didn’t cast it. I went to the polls in Virginia on Tuesday and there were very few people there voting and this was right after work hours when most people actually vote. If you are still under the impression that your vote really doesn’t matter, you are highly mistaken. There are people out there that are plotting to undermine the President and his administration. The plot starts at the state elected officials which this election represented. Knowing you probably would not come out to vote, the first step to undermining has been completed. This election sets a new stage for the vote in 2010 where a many states are setting up for key positions up for grabs. You helped them out by not voting. Why are people not taking voting seriously?</p>
<p>If you did go out and vote this past Tuesday, please let everyone else</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critical Thought #18: Blaming and Complaining</title>
		<link>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Thinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newkirkknows.com/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Chu Effect
Complaining and justifying will get you no where. It will only aggravate the people around you to where they will not want to be
bothered. And it will only deepen your situation.
We should all take the vow, &#8221; I will not attempt to blame, complain, or justify my situation to anybody.&#8221; By continuing to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>The Chu Effect</strong></em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Complaining and justifying will get you no where. It will only aggravate the people around you to where they will not want to be<br />
bothered. And it will only deepen your situation.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>We should all take the vow, <em>&#8221; I will not attempt to blame, complain, or justify my situation to anybody.&#8221;</em> By continuing to complain in negative connotations, we produce results that will allow for more complaining to be done. If we continue to justify why things are the way they are, we will be absolutely correct. If we continue to blame others as the reason why we are in the predicament that we are in, we will never take the steps to change our situation that we are blaming them for. Besides, everyone has issues that they are dealing with. As a result, people are looking for someone that they can vicariously live through until they can change their situation. If you are sending out your negative issues, they will not want to be involved with you unless they are enjoying misery as well. What things have you found yourself complaining about that if you were to just take it for what it is, you could concentrate on the good things in life? Take a day and observe your behavior relative to this theme. How many times a day do you find yourself blaming, complaining, or justifying something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critical Thought #9 Timing and Positioning</title>
		<link>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Thinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newkirkknows.com/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Chu Effect
There are two key elements to life and success: Timing and
positioning. It won&#8217;t happen in the right place at the wrong time or
vice versa.
God is responsible for the timing, you are responsible for
the positioning.I am an avid believer that everything happens for a reason. The
timing is critical and the positioning is just as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>The Chu Effect</strong></em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>There are two key elements to life and success: Timing and<br />
positioning. It won&#8217;t happen in the right place at the wrong time or<br />
vice versa.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><em>God is responsible for the timing, you are responsible for<br />
the positioning.</em>I am an avid believer that everything happens for a reason. The<br />
timing is critical and the positioning is just as critical. The<br />
difference is timing belongs to the universe and positioning belongs<br />
to you. By positioning yourself correctly, and what you are<br />
positioning for is within your heart and purpose, all you have to do<br />
is wait for the timing to come. You will not have the will to win unless you have the will<br />
to prepare. Positioning is all about preparation. People often get caught up on the how.<br />
We only need to be concerned with the what. What are we preparing for and set out to do<br />
it. The how will come automatically and will be in sync with the timing. Just keep in mind<br />
that focusing on the what requires us to step outside of our comfort zone. Are you willing<br />
to step away from what you consider to be comfortable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critical Thought #15 Definition of Love</title>
		<link>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Thinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newkirkknows.com/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Chu Effect
Love is the ability to tolerate the other person&#8217;s imperfections. If they have too many imperfections or you have a low tolerance, the love dwindles.
We all know that God is love. If you take the interpolation between
the shortfalls of man and the omnipotence of God, we can come to rest
where this statement applies. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>The Chu Effect</strong></em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Love is the ability to tolerate the other person&#8217;s imperfections. If they have too many imperfections or you have a low tolerance, the love dwindles.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>We all know that God is love. If you take the interpolation between<br />
the shortfalls of man and the omnipotence of God, we can come to rest<br />
where this statement applies. If we can accept all of the shortcomings<br />
of that special person to be who they are as opposed to being<br />
negatives, we will start to highlight and magnify the positives they<br />
have. Love is defined by the worst moments of your relationship. Society has<br />
a cliche that opposites attract. But my experience states that there is a part II<br />
to that cliche that says &#8220;&#8230; but they do not stay together long.&#8221; This Chu Effect quote is<br />
the reason why. If the two of you do not have anything in common or you are on the<br />
opposite ends of everything you encounter, your spirits will not be able to grow and<br />
definitely not in harmony. You must have a lot in common in order to connect. If you don&#8217;t<br />
have much in common, the relationship changes to one of a battle of control. Would you<br />
rather have a relationship that chooses connection or one that chooses control? How do<br />
you dictate which one prevails?</p>
<p><em>From the book, &#8220;The Long Hot Marriage&#8221; by Todd Creager</em></p>
<p>&#8220;Realistically, we should remember that [our partner] will not always be thinking about us or physically there for us. They have needs, fears, and desires of their own. After about six months into the relationship ill feeling emerge and the illusion of [our partner] being an ideal parent collapses. We become disappointed and disillusioned with our partner. If it hasn&#8217;t dawned upon you before, it&#8217;s time to realize that we cannot always have our own way and we are probably not going to be perfectly loved. This is reality.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newkirkknows.com/index.php/2010/04/critical-thought-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
